The Great Indian Travel Disaster: A maze of reviews and half truths.

A User’s Guide to being a traveller and not a tourist

How many times have you planned a trip, arrived at your destination, stepped into your hotel room, and felt that slow, sinking feeling that you have landed in a mess? How many times have you reached a location that promised to be the Scotland of the East, only to find a barely green meadow infested by a million people on their can’t-sit-at-home weekend trip?

If you’ve been travelling in India over the last decade or two, the horror stories are probably not in short supply. The hotel that looked like a Himalayan retreat in the photos but turned out to be a damp room above a dhaba, where the “mountain view” was a distant view through the water tanks on a building top and electric wires crisscrossing the eyeline.

The “heritage property” had heritage in the sense that nothing had been repaired since it was built in the 1990s. The “five-minute walk from the beach” was, in fact, a twenty-five-minute auto ride. So what went wrong? And more importantly, why does it keep happening?

When Information Was Scarce but Reliable (And Travel Was Actually Fun)

Cast your mind back to simpler times. Before smartphones. Before influencers. Before someone could sit in Gurgaon and write a scathing review of a guesthouse in Coorg that they checked out of in a huff because the Wi-Fi was slow.

Back then, travel information was hard to come by, but what little you had was gold. You would decide to visit a place because someone you knew had actually been there , a colleague, a cousin, your father’s friend, who once spent a week in Ooty. The information was firsthand. Imperfect, possibly a bit outdated, occasionally over the top. But it was real. You could add a few filters and get a faint idea.

You set out knowing that the unpredictable was around the corner, and you made your peace with it before you even packed your bag. The broken geyser, the rude caretaker, poor roads  weren’t failures of planning. They were the trip. Travel was an adventure with very few reference points, and somehow, that made it more memorable than any itinerary a modern-day travel app could generate.

Then the Internet happened.

Information, you see, got afflicted by democracy. And as with most democracies, the arrival of universal participation came at the cost of expertise, authority, and a shared sense of what is actually true.

In the old world, the people who knew things about travel had earned that knowledge by sweating through it, by getting it wrong a few times themselves, by developing genuine relationships with places and people. Guidebook writers, seasoned travellers, the odd journalist who had spent three weeks backpacking through unknown places were people who had a dog in the fight. If they told you a place was good, there was a reasonable chance it was.

Then search engines began crawling the great ether where information apparently resides, and expertise quietly left the building. What replaced it was an algorithm one tireless, emotionless, infinitely democratic sorting machine that has no idea what you really need, but an excellent sense of who has paid the most to appear at the top of your screen. The algorithm had no idea of the sanity (or the lack thereof) of the people feeding its trash can of information. Truth in the times of the Internet is a ghost.

The result is the modern-day travel search: type in “best hotels in Manali under ₹3000”, and you will receive, in no particular order of usefulness, three sponsored listings for places that cost ₹7000, and a blog post titled “TOP 13 AMAZING HOTELS IN MANALI 2019 UPDATED!!” that was last edited a week after it was written.

Have you ever noted that the lists are always odd numbers? The best five hotels, Three Great resorts, and so on. Some internet guru found that odd numbers have better visibility. Odd, isn’t it?

Several reviews that contradict each other entirely, and a YouTube video thumbnail of a man in a backwards cap or a girl with garish red lip gloss grinning in front of a mountain or skipping happily along an empty road. You will need, by conservative estimate, three evenings and the patience of a saint to get anywhere useful.

The Budget Traveller’s Curse

If money is not a concern and if you are the sort of person who can casually throw themselves at a luxury resort and trust that somewhere between the heated pool and the complimentary smile, an acceptable experience will emerge , then, this particular problem doesn’t really apply to you. Off you go. Enjoy your welcome drink and a vermillion mark from a smiling receptionist.

It is when you are travelling on a budget that the world conspires against you with particular enthusiasm. The Internet, you will discover, does not reward the budget traveller with clarity. It rewards them with options, an almost surreal abundance of options, so many options that you would need several holidays just to study them, and an iron will to sift through the drivel that constitutes the average online review. If you attempt this with your spouse, a domestic rift is a guaranteed event.

Here is the fundamental problem with online reviews: they are written by human beings, and human beings, when anonymous and aggrieved, are not at their best. Even when they are not insane or unhappy, they hardly know how to review the trip. The idea of a review is to help the reader to take a decision and not just write drivel that is incomplete and incoherent.

Anonymity, it turns out, gives the inherently picky the daily dose of adrenaline they were apparently not getting anywhere else in life. The expectations that many reviewers bring to a budget property are, and there is no polite way to say this, wildly disproportionate to the price they paid and their apparent willingness to accommodate anything unexpected. A chipped bathroom tile is enough to condemn a place as uninhabitable. A slightly firm mattress becomes evidence of a conspiracy against their lumbar spine. The wrong colour curtain , (yes believe me,  this has been reviewed) suggests a fundamental failure of hospitality that the author clearly feels the world must know about.

On the other hand, a run-down hotel with a good swimming pool will be rated as heaven. A dried-up stream will sound like a romantic getaway, just because the reviewer went there with his first date. And here’s the thing about experience: it is deeply and inevitably individual. One person’s dream cottage in natural settings is another person’s nightmare of creaking floors and noisy crickets outside the window. One man’s charming old-world hotel is another man’s mould-scented regret. No algorithm can bridge this gap, and no star rating has yet been invented that captures the full complexity of what it means to say a place is good.

So, what in the world do you do?

When all you have is the broken information ecosystem, unreliable reviews, and  SEO-optimised nonsense cluttering every search result , what is a sensible Indian traveller actually supposed to do?

A few things still work reliably.

Asking a real human being remains, against all odds, the most dependable way to get useful travel information. Not a chatbot. Not a review aggregator. An actual person who has been to the place you want to go, relatively recently, and whose taste you have some reason to trust. The colleague who just got back from Coorg or a friend who spent a week in Hampi, these people are worth more than a hundred four-star reviews. They will also tell you things no review ever will. Like the fact that the “waterfall” dries up entirely by March, or that the guesthouse owner is wonderful but the mosquitoes are not.

Reading between the lines of reviews is a skill that takes practice but pays off handsomely. Look for the ones that mention specific, verifiable details like the caretaker’s name, the exact view from room number seven, the fifteen-minute walk to a particular tea stall. A couple of actual photos of the actual room, not the lobby. These are written by people who were genuinely there, paying attention. Reviews that read like a grievance letter to a consumer court are almost always about the reviewer, not the hotel.

When you are out to see the world , you have to accept that uncertainty is not a flaw in the plan. It is the whole point. The India that reveals itself to the over-researched, expectation-laden, itinerary-clutching traveller is a thinner, poorer version of the real thing.

The unplanned detour down a road that looked interesting. The accommodation that turns out to be run by a retired professor with strong opinions about the decline of Indian classical music. The meal that arrives is nothing like what you ordered and better than anything you could have imagined. These are not failures of planning. These are the memories you will actually carry home.

Traveller or tourist, you have to pick a side.

The great irony of the information age is that we have more data about travel than at any point in human history, and the average person setting off on a holiday is arguably more confused, more anxious, and more likely to end up disappointed than someone who left in 1995 with a dog-eared Lonely Planet and a general sense of optimism.

The information was once scarce but dependable. Now it is infinite and largely useless. We gave up the map and gained a noise-laden app.

A combination of foolhardiness and genuine curiosity made the traveller in those days. And the distinction still holds. A tourist seeks comfort, convenience, and curated experiences. They want the Switzerland of India to actually look like Switzerland. They want the heritage hotel to smell like a heritage hotel should. They want the waterfall to be falling. When reality fails to cooperate—and in India, reality has a well-established habit of not cooperating—the tourist feels cheated.

A traveller, by contrast, works with what shows up. They wander, linger, and pay attention. They come back with stories rather than just photographs, and they understand, somewhere deep down, that the best moments of any trip are almost never the ones that were planned.

So the next time you decide to go somewhere do this. Plan a little, ask someone who’s actually been, and then put the phone away and go. Choose a weekday if you can, when the schools are in session and no long weekend is lurking on the calendar. On all other days, you travel at your own risk, in the company of approximately everyone else in the country who had the same idea.

As G K Chesterton put it

“The traveler sees what he sees, the tourist sees what he has come to see.”

The only question worth asking before any trip is a simple one: which one do you want to be?

---

---

Explore the other sites

• Travel & Heritage: India Wayfarer
• Sports Analysis: Sportz Corner
• Corporate Satire & Management: The Wrinkled Memo